Cutting overtime pay

LD 1769 bill text Read More MPA opposed

The Maine History Labor Mural, by Seal Cove artist Judy Taylor, which was removed from display at the Department of Labor by Gov. Paul LePage.

“Put simply, this bill would cut wages for thousands of Mainers, who by definition are among the hardest workers in our economy Mainers are known as hard workers, but they also value fairness, and they deserve to be paid properly for their overtime.”
– Testimony of James Myall, Policy Analyst, the Maine Center for Economic Policy

What is the bill

This bill would have cut wages for roughly 19,000 Mainers this year by changing the state’s overtime rules to exclude more working-class employees from eligibility for time-and-a-half pay. It would have done so by repealing state-level overtime rules and revert Maine to the federal-level standards that haven’t been updated in decades. Under this bill, by 2022, approximately 32,000 Maine workers would lose their eligibility.

Why it matters

Everyone deserves to get paid for their work. Overtime protection standards come from the adoption of a 40-hour work week during the New Deal in 1938. Overtime recognizes the inherent dignity of work by guaranteeing that when employees go above and beyond the standard of 40 hours, they are fairly compensated for their extra work. Unfortunately, since 1975, federal overtime protections have been significantly eroded and have not been sufficiently updated. The Obama Administration addressed that problem, but it was challenged in court and will not go into effect. It’s imperative that Maine maintain our own standard, since states have the right to set their own thresholds.

What happened

DEAD: This bill was defeated in the House and died.

Votes

Democrat–Aroostook
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Jackson vote
Opposed
Democrat–Aroostook
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Carpenter vote
Opposed
Republican–Somerset
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Whittemore vote
Supported
Republican–Piscataquis
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Davis vote
Supported
Democrat–Penobscot
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Dill vote
Opposed
Republican–Washington
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Maker vote
Supported
Republican–Hancock
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Langley vote
Supported
Republican–Hancock
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Rosen vote
Supported
Democrat–Penobscot
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Gratwick vote
Opposed
Republican–Penobscot
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Cushing vote
Supported
Republican–Waldo
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Thibodeau vote
Supported
Democrat–Knox
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Miramant vote
Opposed
Republican–Lincoln
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Dow vote
Supported
Democrat–Kennebec
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Bellows vote
Opposed
Republican–Kennebec
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Katz vote
Supported
Republican–Kennebec
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Cyrway vote
Supported
Republican–Franklin
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Saviello vote
Supported
Republican–Oxford
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Keim vote
Supported
Republican–Oxford
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Hamper vote
Supported
Republican–Androscoggin
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Brakey vote
Supported
Democrat–Androscoggin
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Libby vote
Opposed
Republican–Androscoggin
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Mason vote
Supported
Democrat–Sagadahoc
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Vitelli vote
Opposed
Democrat–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Carson vote
Opposed
Democrat–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Breen vote
Opposed
Democrat–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Diamond vote
Supported
Democrat–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Chipman vote
Opposed
Democrat–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Dion vote
Opposed
Democrat–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Millett vote
Opposed
Republican–Cumberland
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Volk vote
Supported
Democrat–York
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Chenette vote
Opposed
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Deschambault vote
Opposed
Republican–York
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Woodsome vote
Supported
Republican–York
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Collins vote
Supported
Democrat–York
MPA bill stance
Opposed
Hill vote
Supported